Cases 51 - 60 of 63
CTS International, Inc. v. Belieu et al
as 2:2011cv01679
Plaintiff:
CTS International Inc and CTS Technical Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joel Crawford , Michael Margoshes , Brett Keller and others
Counter_defendant:
CTS International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Barrett v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv05664
Plaintiff:
Michelle D Barrett
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Barrett et al
as 2:2010cv05144
Plaintiff:
James Branch
Defendant:
James Barrett, Hoyt, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01962
Plaintiff:
Lakeplace Properties , Brian and Kathy L Adams , Mary J Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Barrette et al v. Jubilee Fisheries, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01206
Plaintiff:
Christian Barrette and Katrena Barrette
Defendant:
Jubilee Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Barrett v. Global Discoveries Ltd et al
as 2:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Fred L Barrett and Ditta Company Trust
Defendant:
Global Discoveries Ltd, Samantha Austin and Premier Law Group PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalish et al v. Foremost Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv05198
Plaintiff:
Bruce Kalish and Jay D Barrett
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
McCarthy et al v. Barrett et al
as 3:2009cv05120
Plaintiff:
Thomas McCarthy, Phan Nguyen and Elizabeth Rivera Goldstein
Defendant:
James Barrett, Paul Jagodinski, Alan Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Douglas Barrett, Jr
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
