Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Barton Malow Company
as 2:2013cv00619
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
Barton Malow Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Abrams et al v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams , Angela Alle , John Amos and others
Defendant:
Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Barton v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp23672
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Barton
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Columbus Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Michael E Wright
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department, Barton, Badge #2321 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohio & Vicinity Carpenters' Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc. v. Barton Malow Company
as 1:2012cv01655
Plaintiff:
Ohio & Vicinity Carpenters' Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc.
Defendant:
Barton Malow Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Falzone v. Licastro et al
as 1:2010cv02918
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Falzone
Defendant:
John M. Licastro, Dennis Sweet, Christopher McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodworth v. Konteh et al
as 3:2010cv01617
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bloodworth
Defendant:
Khelleh Konteh, Don A. Coble, Bill Bartleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
