Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Trinidade v. Genworth et al
as 3:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dinesh B. Trinidade
Defendant:
Christopher Wilkes, Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation , HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Blevins v. Berkebile
as 5:2010cv00527
Petitioner:
Tracy Blevins
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Trinidade v. HSBC et al
as 3:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dinesh B. Trinidade
Defendant:
HSBC , Genworth Financial Services , Century 21 Braddock Realty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trinidade v. HSBC et al
as 3:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dinesh Trinidade
Defendant:
HSBC, Glenworth Financial Services, Century 21 Braddock realty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Marfork Coal Company, Inc. v. Smith et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Marfork Coal Company, Inc. and Marfork Coal Company, Inc.
Defendant:
David Aaron Smith, Amber Nitchman, Eric Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Blevins v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Barry J. Blevins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
as 2:2008mc00120
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Mark A. Blevins
Hines v. Northern West Virginia Operations et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
Joe E. Hines
Defendant:
Northern West Virginia Operations, Consol Energy, Inc., Consolidation Coal Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
