Cases 51 - 60 of 85
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Hurtt Fabricating Corp v. Martell Electric LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01118
Plaintiff:
Hurtt Fabricating Corp
Defendant:
Martell Electric LLC and Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bond v. Corizon et al
as 3:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Darmon Bond
Defendant:
Corizon, Andrew Liaw and Katherine Hutchison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. Tarantino et al
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Mattie Bond
Defendant:
Patrick Tarantino and Ralph Moyle Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Irving Concrete of Ohio Inc v. Bond Safeguard Insurance Co et al
as 1:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Irving Concrete of Ohio Inc
Defendant:
Bond Safeguard Insurance Co and American Contracting Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bond v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Robert J Bond
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Bonds et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Harrison A Bonds and Sherry K Bonds
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
