Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Stout et al v. Santa Cruz et al
as 3:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Stout and Raymond Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Albert Santa Cruz , Brad Vincent , Unidentified Trooper #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Lee et al
as 3:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Ronald Barry Evans
Defendant:
Mike Lee, Brad Carson, Anne Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Massey et al
as 2:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
Orlando R. Bogan
Defendant:
Dianne Massey, Brad Carson and Lyndon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Robertson et al
as 3:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Jon C. Lewis , John Brown , Brad Patridge and others
Defendant:
Pat Robertson, Rankin County, Mississippi and Hinds County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emelio v. Valitchka et al
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Vicki Michelle Emelio
Defendant:
Brad E. Valitchka, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Pierce v. Rasco, et al.
as 2:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Keith Kite, Billy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Pontotoc County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Karon S. Bradley
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff's Department , Pontotoc County, Mississippi and Brad Owen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nabors et al v. Safeco Insurance
as 1:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
Billie Nabors and Brad Nabors
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brad Oneal Davis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Medpay Systems, Inc. v. Medpay Assurance, LLC. et al
as 3:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Medpay Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Medpay Assurance, LLC., Tim B. Smith, Brad M. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
