Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Doughty v. Bryan
as 2:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mistye Lynnette Doughty
Defendant:
Timothy Bryan, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01395
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
McDermott v. Waukesha County et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
Bryan McDermott
Defendant:
Waukesha County, Waukesha County Sheriff's Department, Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambelang, Bryan v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ambelang
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prolite Building Supply LLC et al v. Ply Gem Windows et al
as 2:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
Prolite Building Supply LLC , Joshua Sanders , John Sather and others
Defendant:
Ply Gem Windows and James Iverson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wicks, Kyle v. Bartow, Bryan
as 3:2015cv00542
Petitioner:
Kyle Wicks
Respondent:
Bryan Bartow and Brad Schimel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
Bryan James Oliver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lewis, Richard v. Walls, Edward et al
as 3:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis
Defendant:
Edward Walls , Michael Stephen , Theodre Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin & Bayley Inc et al v. O'Bryan Brown & Toner et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Martin & Bayley Inc and Acuity A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
O'Bryan Brown & Toner , Michael P Reilly , Rollie Lehnus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCollum, Clyde v. Hearron, Bryan et al
as 3:2014cv00799
Plaintiff:
Clyde R. McCollum, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan L. Hearron and Sandy L. Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
