Cases 51 - 60 of 426
Holman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Calvin Holman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, R. Butler, A. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennymac Loan Services LLC v. Butler-Mack et al
as 5:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Loan Services LLC
Defendant:
Brandy Butler-Mack and Planet Home Lending LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Schreiner v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Gary Schreiner
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Butler
as 4:2022cv00403
Petitioner:
Guy Maxamillion Taylor
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) et al
as 5:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Housing for Urban Development (HUD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00127
Petitioner:
Quarterrio Taylor
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Carter
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Lewis
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Donnie James Moore
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Guy Maxamillion Taylor
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
