Cases 51 - 60 of 547
Joseph Hall v. City of Portland, et al
as 22-35705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH HALL, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation and EDWARD TEVIS WHEELER, an individual
Timmons v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Ted Timmons
Defendant:
City of Portland and Bryce Askelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Millar-Griffin v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Delaney Millar-Griffin
Defendant:
City of Portland and Brent Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kay et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Madeline Kay, Erik Gallup, Amanda Seaver and others
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. The City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe
Defendant:
The City of Portland, Ariel Livingston, John Does I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colwell v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Logan Colwell
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau, City of Portland and Nicholas Bianchini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Portland Police Division
as 3:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. McKenzie
Defendant:
Portland Police Division, City of Portland and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael O'Callaghan v. USDC-ORP
as 22-70213
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL O'CALLAGHAN, CITY OF PORTLAND and RAPID RESPONSE BIO CLEAN
Petitioner:
MICHAEL O'CALLAGHAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
