Cases 51 - 60 of 141
Jones v. DeMill et al
as 2:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Jones
Defendant:
FNU DeMill, Gary Herbert, Scott Crowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey et al v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00956
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Massey and Jacqulyn Massey
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Daniel B. Harman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Hobbins et al
as 2:2016cv00840
Defendant:
Debra F. Hobbins , Mark B. Steinagel , Francine A. Giani and others
Plaintiff:
Monica C. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bistline et al v. Jeffs et al
as 2:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Bistline , Ruby Jessop , Susan Broadbent and others
Defendant:
Warren Steed Jeffs, Rodney R. Parker and Snow Christensen & Martineau
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cook v. USA
as 2:2016cv00638
Petitioner:
Todd Shawn Cook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Allen v. Utah State Prison et al
as 2:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Allen
Defendant:
Utah State Prison, Scott Crowther, Erik Yorgason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Porter et al
as 2:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dan Robinson , Jill Robinson , Andrew Adamson and others
Defendant:
Stacey Porter, Porter Building Systems, Robert S. West Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wells v. Crowther et al
as 2:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
Jason Quinn Wells
Defendant:
Scott Crowther, Craig Roberts and Rollin Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Kelley et al
as 2:2015cv00820
Petitioner:
Albert Bell
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley and Rollin Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
