Cases 51 - 60 of 204
COSGROVE v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2021cv00092
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
JAMES COSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00516
Defendant:
Dr. Fernando Tejeda, John Wetzel, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Aquil Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MOTZER v. WELLPATH
as 2:2021cv00539
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, STEPHEN D. WIENER, D.O. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADDISON v. WELLPATH
as 2:2021cv00168
Defendant:
WELLPATH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
RAYMEL ADDISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
JANE DOE, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
IVY v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2021cv00061
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CNRP LESLIE, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
GLAVIN IVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Wellpath, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and John/Jane Doe(S)
Plaintiff:
Parris Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2021cv00266
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOE(S)
Plaintiff:
PARRIS HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Bureau of Health Care Services et al
as 1:2020cv02406
Defendant:
Lori White, Bernadette Mason, Carey Ritsko and others
Plaintiff:
Carl S. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYALS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv05578
Plaintiff:
LUTHER RYALS
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and DR. THEODORE VOORSTADT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
