Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Cox v. USA
as 6:2016cv01308
Petitioner:
William Michael Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Merlina v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00154
Defendant:
B. Carter, Christine Coleman, C. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Merlina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Brady et al
as 3:2015cv01753
Defendant:
Randy Bonds, Matthew P. Brady, City of Scappoose and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartman
Unknown:
Daryl L. Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cox v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2015cv01707
Plaintiff:
Wayne P. Cox
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwest Bank v. McKee Family Farms, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv01576
Defendant:
Larry D. Bell, Ben Van Dyke Farms, Inc., John T. Bernards and others
Plaintiff:
Northwest Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Wilson et al v. Cox
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
David Alexander, Boe Ellis, Kyle Izatt and others
Defendant:
Nathan Cox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cox v. Corizon et al
as 6:2014cv00566
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Corizon, Capt. Greg Fox and others
Plaintiff:
William Michael Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington-Rose et al v. Edmiston et al
as 3:2013cv02155
Defendant:
Cox, Joshua Edmiston, Lewis Menges and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Herrington-Rose and Sandy Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox et al v. Holcomb Family Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
Charlene Sue Cox, Leslie Hutchinson, Nicolas Hutchinson and others
Defendant:
Fred "Jack" W. Holcomb, Holcomb Family Limited Partnership, Jones & Roth, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
