Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Royal Ten Cate USA, Inc. et al v. TTAH Trust Company Limited et al
as 1:2011cv01057
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Ten Cate N.V., Royal Ten Cate USA, Inc. and Ten Cate UK Limited
Defendant:
TT Investors Limited and TTAH Trust Company Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cate v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2011cv00203
Petitioner:
Bobby James Cate
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cates v. U. S. Bank, N.A.
as 6:2010cv00550
Defendant:
U. S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cates v. U. S. Bank, N.A.
as 6:2010cv00549
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Cates
Defendant:
U. S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cates v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
as 2:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Danny P Cates
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Du-West Construction v. Deshazer, et al
as 4:2009cv03930
Plaintiff:
Du-West Construction
Defendant:
Hank Deshazer, Hank Deshazer, Hank Deshazer and others
Counter Claimant:
Hank Deshazer, Hank Deshazer and Hank Deshazer
Counter Defendant:
Du-West Construction
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Richards v. Cates
as 1:2009cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bob Richards and Bob Richards
Defendant:
Dan Cates, Dan Cates, Dan Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Day v. Cate
as 4:2008cv00414
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dale Day
Defendant:
Bobbie Peterson Cate
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Day v. Cate
as 3:2008cv01966
Defendant:
Bobbie Peterson Cate
Plaintiff:
Brandon Peterson Day
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. City of Justin Municipality et al
as 4:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Graham
Defendant:
City of Justin Municipality, Mike Evans, Virginia Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
