Cases 51 - 60 of 108
City of Richmond v. Reichl et al
as 3:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
City of Richmond
Defendant:
Frank A. Reichl, Vincent J. Opalewski, Brian C. Steppig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prasad v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Sundari Karma Prasad
Defendant:
City of Richmond and Kevin P Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ensley et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wilber Ensley , Covey Andrews , Shamar Archer and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia , Jason Norton , Bryan T. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. City of Richmond
as 3:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
Patrick Christian
Defendant:
City of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer v. City of Richmond, VA
as 3:2016cv00878
Plaintiff:
Leonard J. Archer, III
Defendant:
City of Richmond, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Holman v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2016cv00539
Plaintiff:
Ronita Roshelle Holman
Defendant:
City of Richmond/Employees, Richmond City Police Department, Richmond City Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sailes v. Richardson et al
as 3:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ellen Sailes
Defendant:
Damon R. Richardson, Dana T. Bedden, Reginald Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Hawkins, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Richmond, City of Richmond Police Department, City of Richmond Magistrate Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
