Cases 51 - 60 of 787
Chet Smith v. Cook County, Illinois
as 22-2969
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Lisa Alcorn v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-2948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA ALCORN, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of TYLER LUMAR
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, JUSTIN CONNER, Officer #18863, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Cloonan et al
as 1:2022cv05770
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sheila Cloonan, Emerald Inc., BMO Harris Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Robert Austin, et al v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 22-2856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT A. AUSTIN and RAAPOETRY LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and BRIAN CURRAN, Psychologist, Cook County Circuit Court Forensic Services
Crosetti Brand v. Stanley Sacks, et al
as 22-2843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CROSETTI BRAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STANLEY J. SACKS and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Preston Bennett v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 22-8016
Petitioner:
PRESTON BENNETT
Respondent:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Helene Miller v. Carol Howard, et al
as 22-2727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER, also known as HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL M. HOWARD, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Kellum v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05184
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kellum
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
