Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Cuevas v. Gage et al
as 4:2014cv02478
Plaintiff:
Bernardino Cuevas
Defendant:
Thomas Wayne Gage and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Quezada Cuevas v. Westerman
as 1:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Digna O. Quezada Cuevas
Defendant:
Philip Westerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rink v. Pruneda, et al
as 5:2014cv00551
Defendant:
Maria de la Luz Pruneda Baez, Sergio Cueva Leal, Francisco Guzman Lozano and others
Plaintiff:
Carl H. Rink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cuevas v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Hugo Cuevas
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Lee Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. Fry at Grand, Inc d/b/a Denny's No. 8009 et al
as 4:2014cv00731
Plaintiff:
Jaime Cuevas
Defendant:
Fry at Grand, Inc d/b/a Denny's No. 8009 , Brookshire, Inc. d/b/a Denny's No. 8615 , Yasee, Inc. d/b/a Denny's No. 7760 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Solorzano-Vargas et al v. AJK Enterprises et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Defendant:
AJK Enterprises, Gary Don Jackson, James Leslie Jackson and others
915) 544-3789 (fax:
Martin Cano-Ortega, Everardo Carmona, Jose Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Cuevas v. Hibashi Teppan Grill, Sushi & Bar
as 3:2013cv03163
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cuevas
Defendant:
Hibashi Teppan Grill, Sushi & Bar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cuevas v. Vasquez
as 1:2013cv00332
Petitioner:
Juan Cuevas
Respondent:
UP Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cuevas v. Vasquez
as 1:2013cv00119
Petitioner:
Juan Cuevas
Respondent:
UP Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
