Cases 51 - 60 of 95
Orinda Intellectual Properties USA Holding Group, Inc. v. Asustek Computer Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02010
Plaintiff:
Orinda Intellectual Properties USA Holding Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Asustek Computer Inc. , Asus Computer International, Inc. , Audio Partnership PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ornelas v. Cate et al
as 1:2010cv02366
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Ornelas
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Scott Kernan, George J. Giurbano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C.M.F. State Prison, et al
as 2:2010cv02506
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Smith
Defendant:
C.M.F. State Prison, C.D.C. and D. M. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner, II v. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv01490
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Turner, II
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, Ron Davis, D. M. Mantel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parallel Media LLC v. The D & M Capital Group LLC et al
as 2:2010cv05666
Defendant:
Does, Moty Spector and The D & M Capital Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Parallel Media LLC
Cedric May Sr et al v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2010cv00978
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino and Does
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jennings, Maurice Jennings, S. D. M. and others
D.M.C. et al v. The County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv03904
Plaintiff:
D. J. C. and D. M. C.
Defendant:
Does, Los Angeles Sheriff's Department and The County of Los Angeles
Hamilton v. Tyler et al
as 5:2010cv01436
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
Debra Tyler, Marie Scherer, L. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norberto Medina v. James D. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
Norberto Medina
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, D. M. Mantel and A. Lloren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
TV Interactive Data Corporation
Defendant:
Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
