Cases 51 - 60 of 254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis et al
as 1:2022cv10082
Defendant:
SHAWN GILLIS, Secretary, USDHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, FILED OFFICE DIRECTO Kenneth Genalo and others
Plaintiff:
LUCAS LEONEL PALACIOS ALVARADO
Petitioner:
Lucas Palacios Alvarado
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Kenneth Genalo and Tae Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421 Immigration: Naturalization Authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12493
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
