Cases 51 - 60 of 200
Flint v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01074
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniel Flint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. USA
as 1:2019cv01071
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel John Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beaudry v. Donna
as 1:2019cv01013
Defendant:
Daniel D. Donna, Jr.
Plaintiff:
John R. Beaudry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00946
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Danielle Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00705
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cote v. Deerfield, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2019cv00697
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America, Daniel Webster Council, Inc. Boy Scouts of America, Deerfield, NH, Town of and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Cote, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Abbott v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobgood v. Hearst Communications Inc.
as 1:2019cv00642
Defendant:
Hearst Communications Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Hobgood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bertin v. Donna, Jr.
as 1:2019cv00579
Defendant:
Daniel D. Donna, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Tina Bertin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00560
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. and The Chemours Company as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Sullivan, Robert Harriman, Nancy Ann Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
