Cases 51 - 60 of 2,941
Rowe v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
David Rowe
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blakeley v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv02215
Petitioner:
Michael David Blakeley
Respondent:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fontana, Sr. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fontana, Sr.
Defendant:
William Lee, David B Rousch and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #055 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe #055
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ward v. Gregory et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tylier D Ward
Defendant:
Keith Gregory, Chief Cantrell, Sara Summerall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #054 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
John Doe #054
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
