Cases 51 - 60 of 113
Tracey White, et al v. Thomas Jackson, et al
as 16-3897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tracey White, Dwayne Anton Matthews, Jr., Damon Coleman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Jackson, John Belmar, Justin Cosmo and others
Tracey White, et al v. Thomas Jackson, et al
as 16-3897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damon Coleman, Kia Bowers, Nathan Burns and others
Defendant / Appellee:
John Belmar, Brandon McKinnon, Aaron Vinson and others
Josifidis v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2016cv01944
Defendant:
Maiorano T. Albert, Jr., Twan T. Bounds, Thomas Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Theodore Josifidis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. David Alberts
as 16-11065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RYAN ALBERTS
Eric Johnson v. City of South Bend, et al
as 15-3887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, SOUTH BEND POLICE DEPARTMENT, JON HANLEY, Sergeant, South Bend Police Department and others
David Ryan Eha v. Trust Account Office Staff et al
as 5:2015cv02553
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
Defendant:
Mailroom Staff, Prison Law Library Legal Mail System Staff, Staff and others
David Ryan Eha v. Los Angeles Police Department Rampart Division et al
as 2:2015cv09013
Defendant:
Central Criminal Appeals Unit, Government Claims Program CVC and GCB, Los Angeles Police Department Rampart Division and others
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
David Ryan Eha v. California Institution for Men
as 2:2015cv07787
Defendant:
California Institution for Men
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
Eha v. North Kern State Prison
as 1:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
Defendant:
North Kern State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Ryan Eha v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2015cv06469
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
