Cases 51 - 60 of 225
Moffite v. Mills
as 3:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Moffite
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Jesse Williams
Plaintiff:
Derrick Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Amos v. Union, MS Police Dept. et al
as 3:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Bradley Emerson, Newton County Court, Neshoba County Sheriff's Office and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Derrick Mochun Amos and Derrick Machun Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddington v. Gulf Coast Exotic Auto, LLC
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eddington
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Exotic Auto, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00676
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Derrick Johnson
Plaintiff:
Christine Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Woods v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv00256
Defendant:
Officer Roderick Brown, Amanda Whaley Smith, John and Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blair v. George County et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Kristy Bourns, Terry Rogers, Derrick Eubanks and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Davis Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Fairley et al
as 1:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Derrick Eubanks, Kristy Bourns, Bobby C. Fairley and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Joe Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tartt v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan R. Pittman, Gordon Rees Scully, M. Patrick Yingling and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick B. Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Harrison County Narcotics Division et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Harrison County Narcotics Division, Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics and City of D'Iberville, MS
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
