Cases 51 - 60 of 2,008
Johnston v. Dr. Lancia et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Johnston and Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Dr. Lancia, Dr. Singh, Chicago Behavioral Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. Boose et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Dr. Boose, Sgt Bridwell, Sgt Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Chess et al
as 3:2024cv50007
Plaintiff:
Edward Abrams
Defendant:
Jamie Chess, Jennifer Hoffman, Ramon Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagsisihan v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2024cv50008
Plaintiff:
Andrei Pagsisihan
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Dr. Sy, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Brookhart
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Markeas D. Brown
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Dr. Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Towbridge v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv04234
Plaintiff:
Tracie Towbridge
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Joshua Godfrey, . Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swopes v. County of Lake Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv17046
Plaintiff:
Randy Herman Swopes
Defendant:
County of Lake Illinois, Dr. Kimberly Loucks and Jason Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Manley v. Babich et al
as 3:2023cv03982
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Dr Babich, Rachell Dodd, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway v. Jazwiec et al
as 3:2023cv50447
Plaintiff:
Gary Conway
Defendant:
Glenn Jazwiec and Dr. George Tannous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
