Cases 51 - 60 of 244
Khalil v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04796
Defendant:
FBI Special Agt. Robert P. Duffy, The City of New York, FBI Special Agt. Steve Bynes and others
Plaintiff:
Adil Khalil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 1:2019cv07111
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Law Offices of Jennifer S. Adams, Kenneth Pitcoff, Morris, Duffy, Alonso & Faley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duffy Archive Limited v. Time Out America, LLC
as 1:2019cv04094
Plaintiff:
Duffy Archive Limited
Defendant:
Time Out America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Duffy v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00605
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Brian Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Duffy v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2019cv03279
Plaintiff:
Dwight Duffy
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Duffy Archive Limited v. Gizmodo Media Group, LLC
as 1:2019cv00468
Plaintiff:
Duffy Archive Limited
Defendant:
Gizmodo Media Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Anaya et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv12341
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Anaya, Cecelia Kauth, Denise Brady and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Anaya et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12339
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Anaya, Cecelia Kauth, Denise Brady and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Atiles et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Poidomani, Michael Lamorte, Paul Nietman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Abruzzese et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11584
Plaintiff:
Joseph H. Calvanese, Thomas Corrigan, Thomas Bent, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
