Cases 51 - 60 of 242
RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLUNKETT v. MCCAFFERY et al
as 2:2014cv06545
Plaintiff:
HEATHER DUFFY PLUNKETT and FRANCIS J. MCCAFFERY, IV
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duffy v. George et al
as 1:2014cv02111
Plaintiff:
James S. Duffy
Defendant:
Michael A. George, John Lott, Sheila Gantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROCKBOURNE INVESTMENT, LP et al v. 100 MILE FUND, LLC
as 2:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
ROCKBOURNE INVESTMENT, LP , CLOVER LANE HOLDING CO and JAMES P. DUFFY, JR.
Defendant:
100 MILE FUND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UFCW LOCAL 1776 AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2013cv07363
Plaintiff:
UFCW LOCAL 1776 AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , WENDELL W. YOUNG, IV , ROBERT MARTUCCI and others
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
LOCKWOOD v. NINOSKY et al
as 3:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. LOCKWOOD
Defendant:
JOHN R. NINOSKY, ESQ., JOHNSON, DUFFIE LAW OFFICES, RITE AID PHARMACY (STORE 00803) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lott et al v. Duffy
as 1:2013cv02768
Plaintiff:
John Lott , Sheila Gantz and Bear Mountain Realty
Defendant:
James S. Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUFFY, INC. v. ULTRA RESOURCES, INC.
as 1:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
DUFFY, INC.
Defendant:
ULTRA RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
