Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Tracey Hampton-Stein et al v. Aviation Finance Group, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03897
Defendant:
Aviation Finance Group, LLC, Aviation Securitization, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Tracey Hampton-Stein, Tracey Hampton-Stein and Tracey Hampton-Stein
Ennis v. City of Daly City et al
as 3:2009cv05318
Plaintiff:
Mark Ennis
Defendant:
City of Daly City, Gary S. McLane, Kranz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv04100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bella Basco et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv06307
Plaintiff:
Bella Basco, Bella Basco, Crystal Ennis and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Daniels v. Director of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv03780
Plaintiff:
Gene Daniels
Defendant:
Director of Corrections, M. S. Evans, Charles Lee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ennis v. Mortgage Tree Lending, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01301
Plaintiff:
Robert Ennis and Robert Ennis
Defendant:
Mortgage Tree Lending, Inc., Diana Grossmann, Robert Draizen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. California Rehabilitation Center et al
as 2:2008cv00818
Petitioner:
Ennis Edward Miller
Respondent:
California Rehabilitation Center and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv01792
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Ennis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ennis v. Astrue
as 1:2007at00605
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Ennis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.