Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Lassila v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20293
Plaintiff:
Miling Lassila
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELBEY v. DAYTON POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 3:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
OLAKWSESU ELBEY
Defendant:
DAYTON POLICE OFFICERS, Richard Scott Davis, Michael Siekierka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ford v. Alexander et al
as 5:2011cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jarritt R. Ford
Defendant:
Drew Alexander and Summit County Ohio, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Russell Judd v. Lappin et al
as 2:2010cv00731
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Attorney General of New Mexico, et al., Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. 1988 BMW, VIN #WBAGC8311J2767674, et al.
as 3:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1988 BMW, VIN #WBAGC8311J2767674, et al., 1998 Lincoln Town Car VIN#1LNFM82W6WY665246, 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche VIN #3GNEC12T74G248765 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Evans v. Cordray et al
as 2:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
Charles R Evans
Defendant:
Richard Cordray and Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tate v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL
as 1:2009wf17000
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Tate
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL
as 1:2008wf17962
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. BAKER
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
