Cases 51 - 60 of 307
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parris v. WestRock Coated Board, LLC
as 3:2020cv00829
Defendant:
WestRock Coated Board, LLC
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Gulati et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00796
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jackson
Defendant:
Prem Gulati, Limestone Correctional Facility, Crestwood Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regions Bank v. Ruby Tuesday Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant:
J Russell Mothershed, Paul Zimmerman, James Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Jones v. Babers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00590
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snell v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Frederick Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Nash
as 1:2020cv00739
Respondent:
Cheron Y Nash
Petitioner:
Frederick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ford v. Robinson et al
as 5:2020cv00703
Defendant:
Dyette, Langford and Robinson
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv08011
Petitioner:
Frederick Lamar Burnett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Town of Faunsdale, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv00142
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Faunsdale, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
