Cases 51 - 60 of 1,610
Ronquillo v. CDCR et al
as 5:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Alexander Ronquillo
Defendant:
CDCR and Father Manuel Chavirra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gabriel A. Magallanes v. Orange County Sheriffs Department
as 8:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Gabriel A. Magallanes
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel Vicente Vela v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Vicente Vela
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Victor Gabriel Estrada v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv06910
Plaintiff:
Victor Gabriel Estrada
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carrick v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04233
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle E Carrick
Defendant:
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PS) Gigena v. Rye et al
as 2:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena
Defendant:
Stephen B. Rye and Brad Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Gigena v. Sexton et al
as 2:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena
Defendant:
Andrea Sexton, Patrick M. Keene, John Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
