Cases 51 - 56 of 56
Nisqually Indian Tribe v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 09-35725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE, Governor of the State of Washington, CHAIRMAN DAVID LOPEMAN, ARNOLD COOPER and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE and FRANK'S LANDING INDIAN COMMUNITY
Merle Janes, et al v. Peter Harris, et al
as 09-35640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERLE JANES, MD, a physician licensed in the State of Washington, JOHN DOE, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23, JANE DOES, A and B, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER J. HARRIS, GEORGE HEYE, MD, ERIN OBENLUND and others
Merle Janes, et al v. Peter Harris, et al
as 09-35602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE JANES, MD, a physician licensed in the State of Washington, JOHN DOE, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23, JANE DOES, A and B, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER J. HARRIS, GEORGE HEYE, MD, ERIN OBENLUND and others
Lynn Hust v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 09-35102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN ANN HUST
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DAVE FREUDENTHAL, Governor of the State of Wyoming and others
James Geary King v. Governor of the State of Washington, et al
as 2:2008cv03083
Plaintiff:
James Geary King
Defendant:
Governor for the State of Washington, Secretary of Department of Corrections and Charles Dorendorf
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demos v. The Governor of the State of Washington et al
as 3:2008cv00123
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
The Governor of the State of Washington, Attorney General of the State of Washington, The Legislature of the State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
