Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Atwood v. USA
as 5:2012cv00149
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Garland Atwood, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Atwood v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Atwood v. Cheney et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
Mike Cheney, James Jackson, Tim Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atwood v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Warden of FMC-Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atwood v. State of Mississippi et al
as 5:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , Vicksburg Police Department and City Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atwood v. Smith
as 2:2011cv00239
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
Stan Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atwood v. Thomas et al
as 5:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
Daniel Thomas, Chris Tankersley, Penny Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyell v. UnumProvident Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
Garland Lyell
Defendant:
UnumProvident Corporation , The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company , Jon Wimbish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garland et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv00766
Plaintiff:
Melanie Garland and Ronald Garland
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Voll et al v. Brignac et al
as 3:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
Norrene H. Voll and Melanie L. Voll
Defendant:
Andre John Brignac and Garland B. Brignac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
