Cases 51 - 60 of 112
HAWK v. OVERMYER et al
as 3:2016cv00135
Petitioner:
BRUCE LEE HAWK, JR.
Respondent:
Michael Overmyer, The District Attorney of the County of Carbon and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HAWK v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv06506
Petitioner:
BRUCE LEE HAWK, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CARBON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENCKINI v. UPPER SAUCON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY et al
as 5:2015cv05526
Plaintiff:
GENE C. BENCKINI
Defendant:
UPPER SAUCON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, BURNY ROGERS, ROBERT COYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawk v. Downs et al
as 3:2015cv01689
Plaintiff:
Allison Hawk
Defendant:
Michelle Downs and Ean Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWK v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2015cv00951
Plaintiff:
CAROL HAWK
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
AIX SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY/NOVA CASUALTY COMPANY v. ROBERT W. YOUNG VFW POST 8805, INC et al
as 2:2015cv00828
Plaintiff:
AIX SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY/NOVA CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
ROBERT W. YOUNG VFW POST 8805, INC and MARIE HAWK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWK v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
TOM A. HAWK
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BULLOCK v. BERRIER et al
as 3:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
CARLTON L. BULLOCK
Defendant:
SUSAN BERRIER, MICHAEL J. HERBIK, IRMA VIHIDAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
