Cases 51 - 60 of 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fenner et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11661
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, General Motors LLC and Robert Bosch LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrei Fenner, Joshua Herman, Anthony Gadecki and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carrie Mizell, Matt Henderson, George Stanley and others
Petitioner:
Trifecta Performance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
chang et al v. Hayes et al
as 5:2017cv11135
Plaintiff:
dong chang , Christina Chang and Sushi Samurai, Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin D. Hayes, Stephen C. Morse and Linda Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes et al v. XPO Last Mile, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hayes and Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
XPO Last Mile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Denhollander et al v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Defendant:
Michigan State University, Jeffrey R. Kovan, USA Gymnastics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Denhollander, Lindsey Schuett, Melissa Vigogne and others
Petitioner:
Chloe Alysse Myers
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jane KMSU Doe, Jane Y. Doe, Jane JMSU Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 5:2016cv13098
Plaintiff:
Hazell Hayes and Melvin Short
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Police Officer John Doe No. 2, Police Officer John Doe No. 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery et al v. Boersen Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Susan Avery Hayes and Cynthia W. Avery
Defendant:
Boersen Farms, Inc. , William R. Laduke , Liquid Haulers Acquisition Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
