Cases 51 - 60 of 454
Hill v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Limuel Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Does
as 4:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hill
Defendant:
Does, Dexter Payne and Asa Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hutcherson v. Bowman et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Willie Hutcherson
Defendant:
Diane Bowman, Millie Hill and Shelly Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tankersley et al v. Bailey's Super Store Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Destany Tankersley, Brandon Hill and Amanda Pinckard
Defendant:
Bailey's Super Store Inc and Dennis Bailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plumlee et al v. Steep Hill Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Don Plumlee, Jakie Hanan and Pete Edwards
Defendant:
Steep Hill Inc, Steep Hill Arkansas, Brent Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Billy R Sanders
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
George E Key, Jr
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnhart v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barnhart
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
