Cases filed in Puerto Rico
Cases 51 - 60 of 969
E-Scooters LLC et al v. Roldan Concepcion et al
as 3:2022cv01281
Plaintiff: Journeys E-Scooters LLC, Jaimys Santana Gonzalez, Enrique J. Quiones Vazquez and others
Defendant: Julio Roldan Concepcion, Frank Hernandez, The Municipal Government of Aguadilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carbonell et al v. Lopez Figueroa et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01236
Plaintiff: Vanessa E. Carbonell, Roberto A. Whatts Osorio, Elba Y. Colon Nery and others
Defendant: Antonio Lopez Figueroa, Alexis Torres Rios and Union of Organized Civilian Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caban-Lopez et al v. Cortes-Feliciano et al
as 3:2022cv01220
Plaintiff: Shakira Caban Lopez, Mariana O. Pelaez Sanchez, Hector Hernandez Rios and others
Defendant: Christian E. Cortes Feliciano, Delvis Datiz Ruiz, MARISOL ROSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Municipio de San Juan and San Juan Municipal Hospital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01307
Plaintiff: Lucia Garcia, Estrella Quiles Quiles and Lucia Garcia on behalf of Shannalee Peguero
Defendant: Municipio de San Juan and San Juan Municipal Hospital, Dr. Luis Cintron, Jane Doe and the Conjugal Partnership ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Hernandez-Soto et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01265
Plaintiff: Liz Hernandez-Soto and Mara Ortiz-Soto
Defendant: United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Concilio Mision Cristiana Fuente de Agua Viva, Inc. v. Ortiz-Hernandez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01206
Plaintiff: Concilio Mision Cristiana Fuente de Agua Viva, Inc.
Defendant: Edwin Lemuel Ortiz Hernandez, Maria del Carmen Arroyo Pantojas, Edwin Lemuel Ortiz-Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Marquez-Sanchez v. Department of Justice of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2022cv01155
Plaintiff: Jose A Marquez-Sanchez and Jose A. Marquez-Sanchez
Defendant: Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez, Department of Justice of Puerto Rico and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo-Diaz et al v. Doctors Center Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01146
Plaintiff: Nadizhda TATIANA Murillo-Diaz, Jorge Santos-Lebron and Conjugal Partnership Santos-Murillo
Defendant: Doctors Centers Hospital San Juan, Inc., Jose Oscar Hernandez-Crespo, SINDICATO DE ASEGURADORES PARA LA SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DE SEGUROS DE RESPONSABILIDAD MEDICO HOSPITALARIA (SIMED) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Rivera-Pina et al v. Luxury Hotels International of Puerto Rico We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01719
Plaintiff: Isaac V Lopez Diaz, Neydimar Oquendo Rodriguez, Jose L Escobar and others
Defendant: Luxury Hotels International of Puerto Rico d/b/a Ritz-Carlton Hotel Spa & Casino and Luxury Hotels International of Puerto Rico doing business as Ritz-Carlton Hotel Spa & Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Burgos-Hernandez, et al. v. Metro Santurce, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff: ISUE BURGOS HERNANDEZ, GUARIONEX ALVARADO ADORNO, in representation of their minor sons YEAB, YAAB and YOAB, Isue Burgos-Hernandez and Guarionex Alvarado-Adorno
Defendant: Metro Santurce, Inc., Maria Casado and her husband JOHN DOE, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership, EDNA FIGUEROA and her husband John Doe 1, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?