Cases 51 - 60 of 124
YOUNG et al v. MCDAVID et al
as 1:2016cv01650
Plaintiff:
JAMES YOUNG and TAWANDA HUNTER
Defendant:
RODERICK SAUNDERS and MARK MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. USA
as 1:2016cv01200
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RICARDO HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUNTER v. ANGELA et al
as 1:2016cv00785
Plaintiff:
JASON T. HUNTER
Defendant:
COWDEN ANGELA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER et al
as 1:2015cv02148
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BURT HUNTER and NANCY HUNTER-KELLY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0632
BIDGOLI et al v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01827
Plaintiff:
ANOOSHIRVAN BIDGOLI , BARBARA HUNTER , ANNIE MIGDAL and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC., DELTA AIR LINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
Movant:
EILEEN SILVER, KUMAR PATEL and RAJESH PATEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ROUDABUSH v. RIPPLE et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN RIPPLE, INTAKE COUNSEL, SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER et al v. MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2015cv01495
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN HUNTER , ALEXANDER BORBELY , GARRETT GAMBINO and others
Defendant:
MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HUNTER v. HARRIS
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff:
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUBBS et al v. LAW OFFICE OF HUNTER C. PIEL, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01129
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR D. STUBBS and SHELLIE J. STUBBS
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HUNTER C. PIEL, LLC and HARBOR BANK OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUDABUSH v. HYLTON et al
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
HYLTON, D. LAWHORNE, STERNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
