Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Irvine et al v. Kate Spade and Company
as 1:2016cv07300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Irvine and Cheryl Anderson
Defendant:
Kate Spade and Company and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irvine et al v. Campbell et al
as 6:2016cv06485
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Irvine, Jr. and Stacy A. Irvine
Defendant:
Judy Campbell and Landsman Realtor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Irvins v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2015cv05180
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Plan Administrative Committee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Plaintiff:
Terrence Irvins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Irvine v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2015cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jason Irvine
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Alexander J. Cazzolli, Brian Fougnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Chappious et al
as 1:2015cv03838
Petitioner:
Shaman Irvin
Respondent:
P. Chappious and Eric T. Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv03240
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Xiao-Ke Gao, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Marion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Attica Correctional Facility
as 1:2015cv00291
Petitioner:
Wayne Irvin
Defendant:
Attica Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carew v. Keane Unclaimed Property et al
as 7:2015cv01732
Plaintiff:
Brian Carew
Defendant:
Keane Unclaimed Property, Unclaimed Property Recovery and Reporting LLC, Robert Irvine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
