Cases 51 - 60 of 122
Mark Ragsdale v. F. Medrano et al
as 2:2018cv02222
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Espita, Correctional Officer Espita, Correctional Officer Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ragsdale
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Oden v. Santana et al
as 1:2017cv05853
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jesus Oden
Defendant:
E. Santana, G. Segura, E. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Todd v. CDCR, et al
as 17-16742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON CORCORAN, D. J. RUIZ and others
Tanner v. McMurray et al
as 1:2017cv00876
Plaintiff:
Shawna Tanner
Defendant:
Timothy I McMurray, Adriana Luna, Audrey Leber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acord et al v. State of California
as 1:2017cv01089
Petitioner:
Richard Acord, Leandro Angel Gonzales, Anthony J. Ruiz and others
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Sandefur v. Britton Turner, et al
as 17-12647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LEE SANDEFUR
Defendant - Appellee:
BRITTON M. TURNER, Dep., #2795, Correctional Deputy, C. MEYERS, Sgt., #2435, Corrections Officer, J. RUIZ, Dep., #2572, Corrections Officer and others
Trustees of Central Laborers' Pension, Welfare & Annuity Funds v. J. Ruiz Construction
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Trustees of Central Laborers' Pension, Welfare & Annuity Funds
Defendant:
J. Ruiz Construction and Jaime Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Darryl Keith LaBat Jr. v. J. Ruiz et al
as 2:2016cv08215
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith LaBat, Jr
Defendant:
Deputy Officer J. Ruiz and Deputy Officer J. Ruiz
Itemid Al Matar v. D.R. Borchardt et al
as 1:2016cv08033
Plaintiff:
Itemid Al Matar
Defendant:
D.R. Borchardt, T.P. Hansen, J. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
