Cases 51 - 60 of 63
THORNTON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX COURT et al
as 1:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD THORNTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX COURT, YAZOO FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, United States Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Walker et al
as 1:2010cv00121
Petitioner:
James Edward Jenkins
Respondent:
Victor Walker and Thurbert E Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Acree et al
as 3:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
Marc Acree, Jeanette L. Little and Troup County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Solicitor -General Troup County, Georgia
as 3:2010cv00110
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
Solicitor -General Troup County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Lift et al
as 5:2010cv00288
Plaintiff:
James Edward Newton
Defendant:
Dr Lift, Mr. Butts, Ms Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Horkan et al
as 7:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
John Bradley
Defendant:
Judge Horkan and James Edward Jarvis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neason v. Walker
as 1:2009cv01068
Petitioner:
James Edward Neason
Respondent:
Victor Walker and Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neason v. Walker
as 1:2009cv00046
Petitioner:
James Edward Neason
Respondent:
Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Drayton v. Howard et al
as 5:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
James Edward Drayton
Defendant:
Mike Howard and Dr. Lift
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards et al v. Harrison et al
as 7:2007cv00196
Plaintiff:
James Edwards, Mary Lewis and Harold Varner
Defendant:
Kevin M. Harrison and Life Power and Praise Apostolic Faith Church Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
