Cases 51 - 60 of 615
PARHAM et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
EVELYN PARHAM, NICHOLE JONES, CARLOTTA MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, GABRIEL ROBINSON and GLEN LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv02356
Petitioner:
Ryan Taylor Nichols
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Petitioner:
THOMAS R. JONES
Defendant:
PAROLE COMMISSION
Respondent:
JONES MICHELE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
JONES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2022cv01513
Plaintiff:
ARTREZE JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. XLEAR, INC. et al
as 1:2022mc00053
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
XLEAR, INC. and NATHAN JONES
NOBLE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NOBLE, MATTHEW SMITH, JONIE SMITH and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
