Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 138
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01210
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHRISMAN v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01130
Petitioner: KEVIN DOUGLAS CHRISMAN
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RYKARD v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01109
Petitioner: PAUL RYKARD
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY et al
as 1:2009cv01092
Plaintiff: ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant: JEFF WRIGLEY and DAVID L. ITTENBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starr v. Wrigley et al
as 1:2009cv01039
Plaintiff: Chanse T Starr
Defendant: JEFF WRIGLEY, Mrs Nester, JENNIFER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Justice v. Jeff Wrigley
as 09-3089
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES E. JUSTICE
Respondent - Appellee: JEFF WRIGLEY
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01011
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starr v. Wrigley et al
as 1:2009cv00224
Plaintiff: Chanse T Starr
Defendant: Jeff Wrigley, Mrs Nester, Jennifer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WRIGLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00964
Plaintiff: ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant: JEFF WRIGLEY and EDWARD G. BUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WRIGLEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00906
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?