Cases 51 - 60 of 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PICKUP et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
DAVID PICKUP, DAREN MEHL, STEPHEN BLACK and others
Defendant:
JOE R. BIDEN, JEFF MERKLEY, CHARLES SCHUMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. HOPE LOUNGE, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
Hope Lounge LLC d/b/a Peace Lounge, Bkelech Etana, BEKELECH ETANA and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Theft of Satellite Communications Services
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRETZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03053
Plaintiff:
ANGELA LAUREN FRETZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, ANTHONY FAUCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FOURSTAR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02818
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ANGIE WAGNER, DEWAYNE HABERSHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
