Cases 51 - 60 of 182
Alvarez v. USA
as 3:2018cv00171
Petitioner:
Jose Arnoldo Alvarez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tobias Bermudez Chavez v. Occidental Chemical Corporatio
as 18-1120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tobias Bermudez Chavez, Gerardo Antonio Fonesca Torres, Franklin Guillen Salazar and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, individually and as a successor to other Occidental Chemical Company other Occidental Chemical Agricultural Products Inc. other Hooker Chemical and Plastics other Occidental Chemical Company of Texas other Best Fertilizer
Tobias Bermudez Chavez v. Occidental Chemical Corporatio
as 18-1120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tobias Bermudez Chavez, Gerardo Antonio Fonesca Torres, Franklin Guillen Salazar and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, individually and as a successor to other Occidental Chemical Company other Occidental Chemical Agricultural Products Inc. other Hooker Chemical and Plastics other Occidental Chemical Company of Texas other Best Fertil
Jose Alvarez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE IRAEL ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
SANTOS ALVAREZ v. UNO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv24452
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANTOS ALVAREZ , MELVIS GARCIA and JOSE FERMIN CALIX
Defendant:
UNO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC. and MYLES CHEFETZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
USA v. Jose Alvarez-Gomez
as 17-11425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS ALVAREZ-GOMEZ, also known as Jose Luis Hernandez
Jose Alvarez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72994
Petitioner:
JOSE ALFREDO ALVAREZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Alvarez-Gomez v. USA
as 3:2017cv02560
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Alvarez-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
