Cases 51 - 60 of 383
King v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03832
Plaintiff:
Diana King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. West Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2017cv03714
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Dwain Williams
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Western Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03405
Plaintiff:
Jennifer King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03361
Plaintiff:
Armeca King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neece et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03337
Plaintiff:
Olivia Neece , Jocelyn Aldridge , Theresa Anderson and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03140
Plaintiff:
Vernedith King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02848
Plaintiff:
Amanda King and Roger Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Saad
as 2:2017cv00065
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
J. Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tuell v. Deere Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02715
Plaintiff:
Clarence Tuell
Defendant:
Deere Credit Services, Inc. and Rural King Holding Co.
Cross_claimant:
Deere Credit Services, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Rural King Holding Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sullivan v. King et al
as 3:2017cv02347
Plaintiff:
Charles Sullivan
Defendant:
Timothy King , Unknown Medical Corp. and Unknown Doctors and Nurses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
