Cases 51 - 60 of 516
Mason v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. and Kelly Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kelly v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Scott Kelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merzke et al v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Merzke, Michael Merzke, Colin James Merzke and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Mobley v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02088
Petitioner:
Deshawn Donta Mobley
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brooks v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02129
Petitioner:
Scott Brooks
Respondent:
L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El-Alamin v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02081
Petitioner:
Malik Al Mustafa El-Alamin
Respondent:
Warden L.B. Kelly and Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kellis v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Larry Kellis and Jill Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Branch v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02104
Petitioner:
Tyrell Branch
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
