Cases 51 - 60 of 70
BROOKS v. OWENS et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY BROOKS, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, ALAN CARTER, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Head et al
as 6:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Patrick Head, Jesse D. Evans, Mary E. Staley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KILGORE et al v. ACADEMY LTD
as 5:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
GREG KILGORE and HOPE KILGORE
Defendant:
ACADEMY LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kilgore v. Sellars et al
as 1:2013cv03651
Plaintiff:
Clifford Kilgore
Defendant:
Eric Sellars, Ms. Williams, Mr. McCard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nease et al v. Sellars et al
as 1:2013cv03475
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Nease, Colon McRae, Lenois Rice and others
Defendant:
Eric Sellars, Williams, McCard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilgore v. Automotive Restyling Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02770
Plaintiff:
Shun Tamika Kilgore
Defendant:
Automotive Restyling Concepts, Inc., Crystal Williams, Stephen Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mells v. City of Darien et al
as 2:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Myron Mells
Defendant:
City of Darien, Steve Jessup, McIntosh County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kilgore et al v. Synthes, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
Floyd Kilgore and Ulrike N. Kilgore
Defendant:
Synthes USA, LLC , Synthes USA Sales, LLC and Synthes USA Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TUCKER v. PEACOCK et al
as 5:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TUCKER, III
Defendant:
PEACOCK, RALPH SEARCY, KILGORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
