Cases 51 - 60 of 169
KELLAR et al v. 1st CAPITAL FINANCE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
as 1:2020cv00402
Defendant:
1st Capital Finance of South Carolina, Inc.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SUSAN KELLAR, SANDRA KELLAR and REGINA LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Progress Solar Solutions, LLC DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 5:20-CV-120-M.
as 4:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Progress Solar Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Progress Solar Solutions, LLC
as 5:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Progress Solar Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Baye v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020ct03044
Defendant:
H. Borges, B. Jones, Y. Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2019hc02326
Petitioner:
Cedric Jamal Lane
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019hc02217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
Lane v. Soucier et al
as 5:2019ct03200
Defendant:
Brent Soucier and Sergeant Boone
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Alexander Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA ALVAREZ V. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00134
Plaintiff:
TRINA LANE GARCIA ALVAREZ
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00028
Petitioner:
PERREN LAMONTE LANE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHILLIPS v. NAPHCARE, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00974
Defendant:
MICHAEL VAN SICKLE, IVY MANNING, AMY JO ROSENTHAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DENISE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
