Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Dau v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01840
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Laurie L Dau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller et al v. York Risk Services Group
as 2:2013cv01419
Defendant:
York Risk Services Group
Plaintiff:
Laurie Miller , Brian Dimas , Anthony Soza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 4:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
Laurie Smith
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rohlik v. Wal-Mart Incorporated et al
as 4:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Laurie Rohlik
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Incorporated , Tudor Converted Products Incorporated, Steris Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gould et al v. Southwestern Furniture of Wisconsin LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael Gould and Susan Tutino
Defendant:
Southwestern Furniture of Wisconsin LLC, Michael Jedlowski and Laurie Jedlowski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wilson-Taylor v. USA
as 4:2013cv00118
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lauri Ann Wilson-Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hudnall v. Schneider et al
as 2:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michael Hudnall
Defendant:
Todd C Schneider , Laurie Schneider , Nutraceutical Research Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: Securities Fraud
Levine v. Levine
as 2:2013cv00257
Petitioner:
Steven L Levine
Respondent:
Dawn Laurie Bender Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tejeda v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02353
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Laurie Sue Tejeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
