Cases 51 - 60 of 346
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Traylor Rains, Nicole M Nantois, Lisa Gifford and others
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter et al v. The City National Bank and Trust Company of Lawton Oklahoma et al
as 5:2021cv00029
Defendant:
The City National Bank and Trust Company of Lawton Oklahoma, JOHN DOE, 2, JOHN DOE, 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carter
Gholson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Lisa Devita Gholson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McBryde v. Arvest Bank
as 4:2020cv00528
Defendant:
Arvest Bank
Plaintiff:
Lisa McBryde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unda et al v. Trinity School at Edgemere
as 5:2020cv00984
Plaintiff:
Richard Unda and Lisa Unda
Defendant:
Trinity School at Edgemere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ferlaino et al v. Crossland Construction Company Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00939
Defendant:
John Doe and Crossland Construction Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ferlaino and James Ferlaino
Intervenor:
Compsource Mutual Ins Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seay et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry et al
as 5:2020cv00915
Defendant:
Michael Howl, Bobby Carmen, James Gore and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Seay and Lois Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saylor et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2020cv00434
Plaintiff:
Nathan Saylor and Lisa Jo Saylor
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reagan v. Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 6:2020cv00243
Defendant:
Miguel Rivera, Okmulgee County Board of County Commissioners, Joseph Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Reagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
