Cases 51 - 60 of 143
Mitchell v. Hearn et al
as 5:2015cv01064
Plaintiff:
Dan Mitchell
Defendant:
Fuller, Jerry Goodwin, Furgerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Leblanc et al
as 5:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Eric Devon Howard
Defendant:
James M Leblanc, Jeffery Travis, Jerry W Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wymore v. Nail et al
as 5:2014cv03493
Plaintiff:
Robert L Wymore
Defendant:
Lonnie Nail, Jerry Goodwin and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Heard et al
as 5:2014cv03174
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray Pittman, Sr
Defendant:
Shalen Heard, Lonnie Nail and Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. David Wade Correctional Center et al
as 5:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lee Jordan
Defendant:
David Wade Correctional Center, Steve Hayden and Lonnie Nail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Nail et al
as 5:2014cv00721
Plaintiff:
Lance Smith
Defendant:
Lonnie Nail, Jamie Fussel, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Scott v. Lonnie Nail, et al
as 14-30291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNIE NAIL, JAMIE FUSSELL, ANGIE HUFF and others
Fisher v. Turner et al
as 5:2014cv00575
Plaintiff:
Charles Fisher, Jr
Defendant:
Antonio Turner, James Arnold, Lonnie Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Wilkerson, et al v. Richard Stalder, et al
as 14-30142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KING WILKERSON and ALBERT WOODFOX
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity, JERRY GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacity and LONNIE NAIL, Lieutenant Colonel David Wade Corrctional Center in his official and individual capacities
Mitchell v. Fuller et al
as 5:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Dan Mitchell
Defendant:
Fuller, Pamela R Hearn, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
