Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Salvador Solis v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 13-56256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALVADOR SOLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, J. CLARK KELSO, Federal Receiver/Medical, K. SEELY and others
Simril v. Paramo, et al.
as 3:2013cv01220
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simril
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo and M Glynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simril
as 3:2013cv01792
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simril
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo and M. Glynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chennault v. Morris et al
as 3:2013cv00854
Plaintiff:
Steve W. Chennault
Defendant:
Morris, R. Campbell, N. Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theodore Butler v. Clark Kelso, et al
as 12-56709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK KELSO, Federal Receiver, J. RIVERA, Chief Medical Executive, J. WALKER, Chief of HC Appeals and others
Darryl Dunsmore v. San Diego County Sheriff's Dep, et al
as 11-57141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL LEE DUNSMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM B. KOLENDER and others
Jones v. Vail et al
as 3:2011cv02144
Plaintiff:
Elvis Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Anthony Vail, M. Glynn, L. D. Zamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLYNN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34792
Plaintiff:
JAMES M GLYNN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
William M. Windsor v. USA, et al
as 10-10349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
USA, ORINDA D. EVANS, HAWKINS & PARNELL, LLP and others
Windsor v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv02027
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
United States of America, Orinda D. Evans, Hawkins & Parnell, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Torts - Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
